China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post.
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge.
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said.
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine.
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation.
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。中新网北京8月24日电(记者李京统)近日，河北张家口康保县部分大白菜在装车前蘸取甲醛溶液保鲜的视频引发舆论关注。事件曝光后，康保县发布通报，确认视频反映情况属实，系收购商为蔬菜运输保鲜，在装运过程中的违法行为。

B | 　　表面上看是为了“卖相”，实则是将利益凌驾于消费者的健康之上，为一己私利出卖良知。这种行为，不是不懂法，而是明知故犯；不是疏忽大意，而是利欲熏心。　　“甲醛白菜”，触碰的是民生红线。此次事件曝光后引发了公众的连锁担忧：这样的“甲醛白菜”我们已经吃了多少年？已经流入了哪些地方？除了白菜，还有多少蔬菜可能藏着类似的“保鲜秘方”？食品安全问题之所以牵动人心，正是因为关乎每一个人的一日三餐，关乎最基础的健康保障。当一颗再普通不过的大白菜都可能成为健康隐患，公众的焦虑便不难理解。　　此事也抛出了一个尖锐的追问：既然一位自媒体博主都能发现“甲醛白菜”，监管的“鼻子”为何“嗅不到”？是商家手段高明、蒙混过关，还是日常抽查流于形式、监管存在盲区？监管的缺位，某种程度上纵容了违法者的侥幸心理。　　守护食品安全，既要治“标”，更要治“本”。眼下最迫切的，是顺着生产、运输、销售链条一查到底，尽快查清问题白菜流向，最大限度减少危害扩散。同时，必须让违法者付出沉重代价，提高违法成本，彻底“打疼”那些敢在食品安全上动手脚的人。更重要的是，监管必须关口前移，从“事后灭火”转向“事前预防”，在田间地头、在批发市场、在流通环节织密检测网络，让问题农产品无处遁形。　　“甲醛白菜”事件再次敲响警钟：食品安全这根弦，任何时候都松不得。唯有以最严谨的标准、最严格的监管、最严厉的处罚、最严肃的问责，才能守护好人民群众“舌尖上的安全”。任何对食品安全的轻视与敷衍，最终都会透支公众信任，付出沉重代价。